Public

<init>

Adds a new range tombstone. This method will be faster if the new tombstone sort
after all the curre

Adds all the range tombstones of tombstones to this RangeTombstoneList.

addAll

addInternal

capacity

comparator

copy

copyArrays

dataSize

grow

growToFree

insertFrom

isEmpty

iterator

maxMarkedAt

moveElements

rangeTombstone

search

searchInternal

setInternal

RangeTombstoneList

Reading from database using SQL prepared statement

A specific moment in time, with millisecond precision. Values typically come
from System#currentTime

java.util.Date

This class provides methods that return pseudo-random values.It is dangerous to
seed Random with the

java.util.Random

An Executor that provides methods to manage termination and methods that can
produce a Future for tr

java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService

Factory and utility methods for Executor, ExecutorService,
ScheduledExecutorService, ThreadFactory, 

java.util.concurrent.Executors

The annotation structure.An instance of this class is returned bygetAnnotations() in AnnotationsAttr

javassist.bytecode.annotation.Annotation

Provides Base64 encoding and decoding as defined by RFC 2045.This class
implements section 6.8. Base

org.apache.commons.codec.binary.Base64

getApplicationContext

Return the original filename in the client's filesystem.This may contain path
information depending 

getOriginalFilename

setScale

/**
     * Adds all the range tombstones of {@code tombstones} to this RangeTombstoneList.
     */

/*
         * We basically have 2 techniques we can use here: either we repeatedly call add() on tombstones values,
         * or we do a merge of both (sorted) lists. If this lists is bigger enough than the one we add, then
         * calling add() will be faster, otherwise it's merging that will be faster.
         *
         * Let's note that during memtables updates, it might not be uncommon that a new update has only a few range
         * tombstones, while the CF we're adding it to (the one in the memtable) has many. In that case, using add() is
         * likely going to be faster.
         *
         * In other cases however, like when diffing responses from multiple nodes, the tombstone lists we "merge" will
         * be likely sized, so using add() might be a bit inefficient.
         *
         * Roughly speaking (this ignore the fact that updating an element is not exactly constant but that's not a big
         * deal), if n is the size of this list and m is tombstones size, merging is O(n+m) while using add() is O(m*log(n)).
         *
         * But let's not crank up a logarithm computation for that. Long story short, merging will be a bad choice only
         * if this list size is lot bigger that the other one, so let's keep it simple.
         */

// Addds the remaining ones from tombstones if any (note that addInternal will increment size if relevant).

How to use copyArraysmethodin org.apache.cassandra.db.RangeTombstoneList

Best Java code snippets using org.apache.cassandra.db.RangeTombstoneList.copyArrays (Showing top 5 results out of 315)

How to use
copyArrays
method
in
org.apache.cassandra.db.RangeTombstoneList