Public

<init>

Adds a new range tombstone. This method will be faster if the new tombstone sort
after all the curre

Adds all the range tombstones of tombstones to this RangeTombstoneList.

addAll

addInternal

capacity

comparator

copy

copyArrays

dataSize

grow

growToFree

insertFrom

isEmpty

iterator

maxMarkedAt

moveElements

rangeTombstone

search

searchInternal

setInternal

RangeTombstoneList

Parsing JSON documents to java classes using gson

A generic Abstract Window Toolkit(AWT) container object is a component that can
contain other AWT co

java.awt.Container

This class is used to encode a string using the format required by
application/x-www-form-urlencoded

java.net.URLEncoder

 Locale represents a language/country/variant combination. Locales are used to
alter the presentatio

java.util.Locale

A counting semaphore. Conceptually, a semaphore maintains a set of permits. Each
#acquire blocks if 

java.util.concurrent.Semaphore

javax.swing.JFrame

Operations on java.lang.String that arenull safe.

 * IsEmpty/IsBlank - checks if a String contains 

org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils

requestLocationUpdates

getResourceAsStream

putExtra

/**
     * Adds all the range tombstones of {@code tombstones} to this RangeTombstoneList.
     */

/*
         * We basically have 2 techniques we can use here: either we repeatedly call add() on tombstones values,
         * or we do a merge of both (sorted) lists. If this lists is bigger enough than the one we add, then
         * calling add() will be faster, otherwise it's merging that will be faster.
         *
         * Let's note that during memtables updates, it might not be uncommon that a new update has only a few range
         * tombstones, while the CF we're adding it to (the one in the memtable) has many. In that case, using add() is
         * likely going to be faster.
         *
         * In other cases however, like when diffing responses from multiple nodes, the tombstone lists we "merge" will
         * be likely sized, so using add() might be a bit inefficient.
         *
         * Roughly speaking (this ignore the fact that updating an element is not exactly constant but that's not a big
         * deal), if n is the size of this list and m is tombstones size, merging is O(n+m) while using add() is O(m*log(n)).
         *
         * But let's not crank up a logarithm computation for that. Long story short, merging will be a bad choice only
         * if this list size is lot bigger that the other one, so let's keep it simple.
         */

// Addds the remaining ones from tombstones if any (note that addInternal will increment size if relevant).

How to use copyArraysmethodin org.apache.cassandra.db.RangeTombstoneList

Best Java code snippets using org.apache.cassandra.db.RangeTombstoneList.copyArrays (Showing top 5 results out of 315)

How to use
copyArrays
method
in
org.apache.cassandra.db.RangeTombstoneList