public static boolean isProperty(Field f, Type boundType, Filter filter) { return ( filter.returnStatic() || ! Modifier.isStatic( f.getModifiers() ) ) && ( filter.returnTransient() || ! Modifier.isTransient( f.getModifiers() ) ) && !f.isSynthetic() && ReflectionUtil.isPropertyType( boundType ); }
public static boolean isProperty(Method m, Type boundType, Filter filter) { return ReflectionUtil.isPropertyType( boundType ) && !m.isSynthetic() && !m.isBridge() && ( filter.returnStatic() || !Modifier.isStatic( m.getModifiers() ) ) && m.getParameterTypes().length == 0 && ( m.getName().startsWith( "get" ) || m.getName().startsWith( "is" ) ); // TODO should we use stronger checking on the naming of getters/setters, or just leave this to the validator? }
public static boolean isProperty(Method m, Type boundType, Filter filter) { return ReflectionUtil.isPropertyType( boundType ) && !m.isSynthetic() && !m.isBridge() && ( filter.returnStatic() || !Modifier.isStatic( m.getModifiers() ) ) && m.getParameterTypes().length == 0 && ( m.getName().startsWith( "get" ) || m.getName().startsWith( "is" ) ); // TODO should we use stronger checking on the naming of getters/setters, or just leave this to the validator? }
public static boolean isProperty(Field f, Type boundType, Filter filter) { return ( filter.returnStatic() || ! Modifier.isStatic( f.getModifiers() ) ) && ( filter.returnTransient() || ! Modifier.isTransient( f.getModifiers() ) ) && !f.isSynthetic() && ReflectionUtil.isPropertyType( boundType ); }
public static boolean isProperty(Method m, Type boundType, Filter filter) { return ReflectionUtil.isPropertyType( boundType ) && !m.isSynthetic() && !m.isBridge() && ( filter.returnStatic() || !Modifier.isStatic( m.getModifiers() ) ) && m.getParameterTypes().length == 0 && ( m.getName().startsWith( "get" ) || m.getName().startsWith( "is" ) ); // TODO should we use stronger checking on the naming of getters/setters, or just leave this to the validator? }
public static boolean isProperty(Field f, Type boundType, Filter filter) { return ( filter.returnStatic() || ! Modifier.isStatic( f.getModifiers() ) ) && ( filter.returnTransient() || ! Modifier.isTransient( f.getModifiers() ) ) && !f.isSynthetic() && ReflectionUtil.isPropertyType( boundType ); }
public static boolean isProperty(Method m, Type boundType, Filter filter) { return ReflectionUtil.isPropertyType( boundType ) && !m.isSynthetic() && !m.isBridge() && ( filter.returnStatic() || !Modifier.isStatic( m.getModifiers() ) ) && m.getParameterTypes().length == 0 && ( m.getName().startsWith( "get" ) || m.getName().startsWith( "is" ) ); // TODO should we use stronger checking on the naming of getters/setters, or just leave this to the validator? }
public static boolean isProperty(Field f, Type boundType, Filter filter) { return ( filter.returnStatic() || ! Modifier.isStatic( f.getModifiers() ) ) && ( filter.returnTransient() || ! Modifier.isTransient( f.getModifiers() ) ) && !f.isSynthetic() && ReflectionUtil.isPropertyType( boundType ); }
public static boolean isProperty(Method m, Type boundType, Filter filter) { return ReflectionUtil.isPropertyType( boundType ) && !m.isSynthetic() && !m.isBridge() && ( filter.returnStatic() || !Modifier.isStatic( m.getModifiers() ) ) && m.getParameterTypes().length == 0 && ( m.getName().startsWith( "get" ) || m.getName().startsWith( "is" ) ); // TODO should we use stronger checking on the naming of getters/setters, or just leave this to the validator? }
public static boolean isProperty(Field f, Type boundType, Filter filter) { return ( filter.returnStatic() || ! Modifier.isStatic( f.getModifiers() ) ) && ( filter.returnTransient() || ! Modifier.isTransient( f.getModifiers() ) ) && !f.isSynthetic() && ReflectionUtil.isPropertyType( boundType ); }